The
researchers are exploring ways to detect the ears' features like they
were fingerprints. A group of British researchers used a
process called "image
ray transform"
to shoot light rays at human ears, and then repeat an algorithm to
draw an image of the tubular-shaped parts of the organ. The curved
edges around the rim of the ear is a characteristic -- and most
obvious -- example. Then, the researchers converted the images into a
series of numbers marking the image as your own. Finally, it's just a
matter of a machine scanning your ears again, and matching it up to
what's already stored in the system, which the researchers were able
to do accurately 99.6 percent of the time. In March of 2012, a pair
of New Delhi scientists also tried scanning ears using Gabor
filters
-- a kind of digital image processor similar to human vision, but
were accurate to a mere 92 to 96.9 percent, according to a recent
survey of ear biometric research.
It
may even be possible to develop ear-scanning in a way that makes it
more reliable than fingerprints. The reason is because your
fingerprints can callous over when doing a lot of hard work. But
ears, by and large, don't change much over the course of a lifespan.
There's a debate around this, however, and fingerprinting has a much
longer and established history behind it. A big question is whether
ear-scanning will work given different amounts of light, or when
covered (even partially) by hair or jewelry. But if ear-scanners get
to the point of being practical, then they could possibly work
alongside fingerprinting instead of replacing them. Maybe in the
future we'll see more extreme ear modification come along as a
counter-measure.
Regards,
No comments:
Post a Comment